Volume 1, Issue 10 25th January 1999
netPEP Market Commentary
 
This report covers the six month period 16th July 1998 to 13th January 1999. During this period the FTSE 100 Index fell 250 points from 6156.1 to 5906.1 a drop of 4.06%. This compares with netPEP’s offer price which fell from 144.05 to 138.52, a drop of 3.84% well within the investment managers estimated tracking error range of plus or minus 0.4% per annum.

Big Swings

The Emerging Marker Effect

With the market down 20% and up 20% the Financial Times was prompted to write recently, " If you are going to buy shares these days, you have to have strong nerves and a map". Most of the volatility over the past 5 years has been on account of serious economic crises in the emerging markets. It happened in 1994 with the Mexican peso crisis, the phenomenal debt crisis in Thailand in 1997, Russia in 1998 and now Brazil in 1999. But it has been right not to have been panicked out of the market despite the wild swings, adding weight to the argument that private investors are probably better investors than the professionals because they take the longer term view. The professionals on the other hand are prone to taking a short term view because of the competitive pressures caused by short term comparisons with their benchmark indices and the peers.

Best & Worst

Price volatility inevitably shows up big differences between the shares comprising the Index but it is worth noting in the table below the extraordinarily wide variations between shares within the same class.

The biggest difference is in the Services sector where Kingfisher (otherwise known as Woolworths) was up 30% whereas United News & Media was down 44%. Given that the performance period is only six months these variations are very large and make the job of stock selection very complex and demonstrates the value of tracker funds.

Top 5 performers were Orange which beat the Index by a wide margin of 40% followed by Kingfisher, Vodafone, Hays and Standard Chartered which beat the Index by 34%, 27%, 22% and 21% respectively. Standard & Chartered has at last managed to change its share price fortunes after suffering so badly in the early part of last year on account of the Asian economic crisis.

Bottom performers were P&O, Tomkins, British Airways, United News & Media and ICI which under-performed the Index by margins of 32%, 34%, 38%, 40% and 44% respectively.

Ins and Outs

There have been a large number of new entrants to the hallowed club of Britain’s top 100 companies including Nycomed Amersham which came in and went out again in seven months. ASH the anti-smoking lobby will be disappointed that Imperial Tobacco and Gallaher both entered the Index. However, the popular high street electrical retailer, Dixons came in as well as Allied Zurich which was the result of the merger of BATS financial services interests with Zurich Life. And finally old timer Hanson which has had a holiday from the FTSE 100 club since it demerged itself some years ago has rejoined.

Other companies to appear include Colt Telecom, Scottish & Southern, Energy Group, Securicor and Telewest.

Disappearing acts were performed by Blue Circle, British Steel, Enterprise Oil, LASMO, Next, Rank, RMC and Wolseley. All these changes have a profound affect on the performance of tracker funds because every time a change occurs transaction costs arise which the Index makes no allowance for. It is therefore pleasing to note the very modest tracking error of netPEP’s Tracker Fund as at 13th January 1999 of 0.37% since the fund was launched in April 1997. The graph below illustrates the weekly tracking differences since launch.

This document is issued by MBO Advisory Partners who are regulated by the FSA. Any opinions expressed herein reflect best judgment and information at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. Reference(s) to any investment(s) in this document is/are not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell by MBO Advisory Partners or any named contributors to this document. Remember the price of units and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back your original investment. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. PEP and ISA tax reliefs may change in the future and their value will depend on your individual circumstances.
trackerfunds THIS ISSUE   ARCHIVE FEEDBACK