| This report covers the 6 month period from 17th December 1997
        to 17th June 1998. During this time the shares in the FTSE 100 Index have
        performed well overall, recording an increase of 10.38% compared with netPEPs offer
        to offer price performance which showed an increase of 11.18%. The difference is the
        accumulation of dividend income which will be distributed to unitholders on the register
        as at the end of July. Throughout the period netPEPs unit price has tracked the
        Index very closely and the chart below shows the weekly tracking differences. The
        significant ones are tagged on the chart. 
        Asian crisis 
        This excellent performance by the Index is attributable to a number of factors, not
        least the relative stability of the major western economies that have benefitted from the
        flight by investors out of Asian markets which are in crisis. Imagine the panic when a
        market like Indonesia can crash by 90% relative to Wall Street. This flight of capital to
        the comparative safe haven of the US , UK and European markets has been good for bonds and
        yields have been falling rapidly which has pushed equity markets higher. 
        The Asian crisis has, of course, given UK and US equity investors some cause for alarm.
        The shares of companies that export manufactured goods to Asia have been hard hit. Concern
        has also been expressed about the prospects for a torrent of cheap imports from Asia on
        the back of very cheap currencies resulting from the economic crisis. 
        Within the top 100 British companies, the performance has been diverse over the past 6
        months. Orange heads the leaders list with shares up 87% over the period which compares
        with manufacturer GKN whose shares are down 37% in anticipation no doubt about the adverse
        effects of problems in Asia. But these performances are exceptional and the combined
        effect on the Index overall is very small since together they account for only 1% of the
        whole Index. 
        Sector differences 
        Looking at sectors, the impact of individual shares is more noticeable. The biggest
        sector, Financials (27%) shows an average increase of 4.42% whereas Consumers Goods
        (Pharmaceuticals and Food Manufacturers), which account for a total of 18% of the whole,
        recorded an average rise of 19%. These figures bear no resemblance to the size-weighted
        performances of the sectors which are much more relevant since they reflect a true picture
        of the contribution to performance that each sector makes to the Index. Hence Cadbury
        Schweppes up 43% which represents 0.88% of the Index contributed less to the Index than
        SmithKline Beecham which was up only 12% representing 3.9% of the Index. 
        
          
            | SECTOR | 
            % of the Index | 
            Size-weighted performance % | 
            Average % performance of constituents | 
           
          
            | Consumer Goods | 
            18.2 | 
            + 3.202 | 
            + 19.26 | 
           
          
            | Financials | 
            27.2 | 
            + 0.943 | 
            + 4.42 | 
           
          
            | General Industrial | 
            7.3 | 
            + 0449 | 
            - 1.4 | 
           
          
            | Mineral Extraction | 
            10.4 | 
            - 0.252 | 
            - 6.3 | 
           
          
            | Services | 
            22.9 | 
            + 3.464 | 
            + 15.6 | 
           
          
            | Utilities | 
            13.8 | 
            + 4.144 | 
            + 21.5 | 
           
         
        Arrivals and departures 
        There have been a number of exits and new entrants to the FTSE 100 Index over the past
        6 months reflecting merger and acquisition activity . Commercial Union and General
        Accident combined to make CGU, Grand Met and Guinness created Diageo and Nycomed acquired
        Amersham. Sparkling share price performance allowed Mysis and Compass to join the elite
        group and relative decline in unfashionable sectors caused Imperial Tobacco, Smith &
        Nephew, Tate & Lyle and Imperial Tobacco to drop out. Activity like this makes it
        difficult to keep the tracking differences of any Index Tracker to within the estimated
        limits because the costs of dealing and rebalancing the portfolio are not reflected in the
        Index. The results achieved by Barclays Global Investors are very reassuring and
        illustrate the importance of being the largest tracking fund managers in the world and
        being able as a consequence to negotiate levels of costs and charges which impact very
        little on the funds overall performance. The tracking differences since netPEP was
        launched are shown below. 
          
           
        Big versus small 
        The performance of large cap shares versus the small caps has been a subject of raging
        debate over recent years with the large caps which make up the FTSE 100 Index
        outperforming the rest of the market by a very wide margin. Supporters of small companies
        have been pointing to the recent reversal of this trend as illustrated in the table below
        where the Mid 250 and the Small Cap indices have shown a rise of + 5.5% over the last 3
        months against a modest fall by the FTSE 100 Index over the same period of 1.5%.
        Between 16th and 19th June both the SmallCap and the Mid 250 Indices
        have lost all of this ground falling 3.3% and 3.1% respectively against the FTSE 100 Index
        which rose by 2.7%. 
           
        This continuation of the large cap theme is explained by the nervousness of large
        foreign institutions. Now the securities industry is truly global their portfolios contain
        increasing proportions of overseas investments. Their over-riding concern is to invest in
        well researched companies which offer a level of liquidity which small companies cannot
        provide. Coupled with the actions of local UK institutions whose portfolios have been
        under-performing on account of under-weight positions in the FTSE stocks, the share prices
        quickly rebound after short term periods of weakness as UK institutions top up their
        holdings to match the Index performance more closely in the future. 
        Therefore the place to be is the large cap shares just as it has been in America for
        the past few years.  |